Diploma
Graduate Diploma in Dispute Resolution
- CRICOS Code: 075331E
Navigation
What will I study?
Overview
Course structure
Students must complete 50 credit points of study from the prescribed list of subjects.
Students who do not have a law degree from a common law jurisdiction or any prior legal studies or experience are also expected to complete the two-day preliminary subject Australian Legal Process and Legal Institutions.
Subject timing and format
The Melbourne Law Masters program has been designed around the busy schedules of working professionals. Subjects are offered from February to December each year. Most subjects are taught intensively over five days, with some subjects taught for two hours each week during the semester.
Subjects delivered online will have a combination of pre-recorded lecture content, live sessions and discussion boards among other resources. On-campus subjects involve interactive, seminar-style classes in the Law Building in Melbourne.
Class sizes are typically limited to 30 students regardless of delivery mode.
Duration
Full-time students enrol in 50 credit points per semester (or half-year period) and have an expected course duration of six months. Part-time* students enrol in 25 credit points per semester (or half-year period) and have an expected course duration of one year. Semesters without enrolments require a student to apply for a leave of absence.
*Part-time enrolment is for domestic students only. Part-time students may reduce their study load to 12.5 credit points per half-year period and thus have a maximum course duration of two years.
For detailed course and subject information, see the Handbook: Graduate Diploma in Dispute Resolution.
Gary Cazalet
Responding to and resolving disputes is core business for lawyers. The subjects in this specialisation will enable you to expand your skills and knowledge in this rapidly changing environment. The subjects are taught by eminent judges, practitioners and scholars from Australia and overseas.
Co-Director of Studies, Dispute Resolution - Gary Cazalet
Sample course plan
View some sample course plans to help you select subjects that will meet the requirements for this diploma.
6 months
50 pts
- Subject 1 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 2 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 3 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 4 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
First half of year
25 pts
- Subject 1 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 2 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
Second half of year
25 pts
- Subject 3 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 4 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
Students who do not have a law degree from a common law jurisdiction or any prior legal studies or experience are also expected to complete the two-day preliminary subject Australian Legal Process and Legal Institutions.
6 months
50 pts
- Overview subject 0 pts
compulsory
0 pts
- Subject 1 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 2 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 3 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 4 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
Students who do not have a law degree from a common law jurisdiction or any prior legal studies or experience are also expected to complete the two-day preliminary subject Australian Legal Process and Legal Institutions.
First half of year
25 pts
- Overview subject 0 pts
compulsory
0 pts
- Subject 1 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 2 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
Second half of year
25 pts
- Subject 3 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
- Subject 4 12.5 pts
elective
12.5 pts
Explore this course
Explore the subjects you could choose as part of this diploma.
- 12.5 pts
In the preparation and conduct of litigation no area of law is more important than the law of evidence. Advanced Evidence aims to provide students with an enhanced understanding of the law of evidence. This subject focuses on key provisions of the uniform evidence legislation, which now operates in all Commonwealth, Victorian, New South Wales, Tasmanian, Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory courts, and primarily examines the law of evidence in the context of criminal proceedings, where it is is strictly applied. Students can expect to refresh, deepen and develop their understanding of the factual, legal and policy issues associated with the law of evidence and to learn to analyse the admissibility of evidence at an advanced level
This subject is primarily based on a detailed examination of those rules of evidence regarding admissibility that are of particular significance in trials, especially criminal trials.
Principal topics may include:
- Relevance
- Hearsay evidence
- Opinion evidence
- Admissions
- Tendency and coincidence evidence
- Credibility evidence
- Identification evidence
- Discretionary and mandatory exclusion of evidence.
Note: this is a highly technical subject taught at an advanced level. It is only recommended for students with a law background.
- 12.5 pts
Dispute resolution and problem-solving lie at the core of modern professional life for lawyers, business people and anyone who works with more than one other person. This subject provides an overview of the range of dispute resolution techniques used internationally. This subject differentiates the most prominent dispute resolution methods, including traditional litigation, arbitration (in its many forms, including international commercial arbitration negotiation) and mediation (also in its many forms, including partnering, mini-trials and dispute resolution coordinators). It also includes skills training in negotiation and mediation, designed to increase effectiveness in both resolving disputes and enhancing problem-solving abilities.
Principal topics include:
- The nature and varieties of disputes, how they arise and how they are avoided
- The options for resolving disputes: litigation, arbitration, negotiation, mediation and conciliation
- Factors considered by people when they choose a dispute resolution method, including social, cultural and economic factors
- Relevant law reform initiatives, with an emphasis on Australia, other common law countries and selected Asian countries
- Cross-cultural issues in the dispute resolution process
- The roles of judges, lawyers and the courts in the alternative dispute resolution process
- An analysis and comparison of the dispute resolution processes in environmental and native land title disputes, with an emphasis on Australia, Canada and the United States
- Basic skills for successful negotiation and mediation, including theory and practical exercises.
- 12.5 pts
The complexities of the commercial and technical environment in which construction projects are undertaken make disputes virtually inevitable. Participants in the industry – whether lawyers or industry professionals – therefore need to be aware of, and able to apply, a range of dispute avoidance and management techniques when putting together contractual documentation or administering projects. These options are constantly evolving, with recent examples including the increasing use of disputes boards and court-initiated procedures such as those being implemented by the Technology Engineering and Construction List of the Victorian Supreme Court.
The subject lecturer, David Opperman, is able to bring to the classroom extensive experience in the active resolution of disputes in construction projects by mediation and other alternative dispute resolution processes, as well as through international and domestic arbitration and litigation processes. He also involves guest lecturers who have specialist, cutting-edge experience in dispute avoidance and alternative dispute resolution techniques.
Principal topics will include:
- Construction contract provisions relating to disputes: Objectives, approaches and enforceability
- Conflict: Conflict patterns and management
- Communication and negotiation skills
- Dispute Avoidance Procedures (DAPs), Dispute Review Boards (DRBs), Dispute Adjudication Boards (DABs) and dispute resolution advisers (DRAs)
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Mediation (including mock mediation), senior executive appraisal/ mini trials, non-binding and binding expert determination, domestic and international arbitration and hybrid and multi-tiered processes
- Selecting the most appropriate form of DAP and/or ADR processes
- Process dynamics, options and strategic issues, including paths to ADR.
- 12.5 pts
This subject focuses on skills and strategies that are key to negotiating, swaying and influencing counterparties in business negotiations and deal-making. In this subject, skills will be developed by constantly improving as business negotiators by asking the right questions, framing issues, gaining lessons learned, defining success metrics and negotiating with others with different skill-sets, perceptions and backgrounds. The subject will have a particular focus on negotiations in cross-border settings. The teacher is a leading expert in negotiation training, having taught and researched at prestigious institutions such as Berkeley, Stanford and Harvard, and trained executives at some of the world’s largest companies. He will draw on both real-world transactional and academic experience in leading the subject.
Principal topics and skills include the following:
- Understand why conflict arises between people and business organisations, within both a domestic and international context
- Assess and apply various strategic frameworks in diverse settings (business-to-business, private-public sector, etc)
- Define specific success metrics within diverse teams and groups before, during and after business negotiations and deal-making settings
- Apply and leverage the main conceptual frameworks related to transaction planning and conflict resolution within diverse environments - including distributive, integrative, and mixed motive negotiation styles (among others)
- Analyse and synthesise business negotiation theories, skill-sets and studies as current or future business negotiation professionals
- Recognise implicit and explicit biases and nudges that may hinder or help business negotiations, while developing strategies on how to bridge and create value from such gaps
- Develop, and learn how to continually develop, a value-added business negotiation toolbox and confidence as business negotiators and deal-makers
- Understand key contractual terms that may pivot business negotiators and negotiations
- Enhance effective communication skill-sets, both verbal and nonverbal, and develop an empathetic understanding of how and why counterparties may see things differently from you and your business unit
- Possess an overall understanding of the nature of disputes and conflict resolution, including ethical, cultural, economic, psychological and emotional factors.
- 12.5 pts
Class actions have become an increasingly prominent feature of Australia’s litigation landscape. Some people think they enhance access to justice, offer an efficient way to deal with large numbers of claims and function as an effective regulatory tool, while others criticise them as improper ‘private’ regulation or as just another way for lawyers to become wealthy. Students will have the opportunity to critically evaluate these views. Law reform proposals will be considered, as will the development, present state and likely future directions of the law and practice of Australian class actions. While the focus will be on Australia, methods used in other countries to bring and manage group proceedings will be considered and compared. Students will have the opportunity to engage and debate with lecturers and guest lecturers with substantial academic, practice, judicial and international experience.
Principal topics include:
- The origins of modern class action regimes in Australia
- Comparisons of the federal and Victorian regimes with those in other Australian and overseas jurisdictions
- The main stages of class action litigation
- The roles of lawyers, judges, parties, litigation funders and regulators
- Specific issues, including choosing a forum, defining the class, the role of the lead plaintiff, entrepreneurial lawyering, identifying and notifying class members, settlement and court approval
- Comparing class actions with other procedures available for bringing and managing complex litigation
- Securities class actions and the regulatory role of the class action
- Funding and costs issues, including the role of commercial litigation funders.
- 12.5 pts
This subject provides a broad overview of the range of dispute resolution options available to parties in relation to construction disputes, as well as detailed insights into the practical aspects and policy drivers of these options. It provides an opportunity to understand how to efficiently conduct construction dispute procedures in various Australian courts, arbitration (both domestic and international) and expert determination. It also engages with key industry debates about the rational reform of dispute processes in Australia and internationally. The lecturers bring extensive dispute resolution expertise to the subject and have been involved in many of Australia’s most significant construction-related disputes.
Principal topics include:
- Practice and procedure in the Supreme Courts of New South Wales and Victoria and the Federal Court of Australia, considering differences and assessing where best practice lies
- Evidence for construction cases—how to identify what is necessary for the principal claims that arise in construction cases (eg variations, delay, prolongation and latent conditions claims)
- Special issues relating to expert evidence and practical issues arising from the rules of evidence
- Pleading claims
- Problems with discovery and how they may be solved (this involves a review of the policy considerations that underlie the recent changes to the Federal Court Rules and the Victorian Supreme Court Rules, as well as practice in international arbitration)
- Managing the trial or hearing so that it is as efficient as possible
- The appeal process that is available
- The domestic arbitration legislative framework: how it can be used to improve the efficiency of dispute resolution
- Issues of proof in complex disputes, focusing on delay and disruption claims.
- 12.5 pts
Discrimination and sexual harassment in the workplace represent an overwhelming majority of total complaints made to anti-discrimination authorities. Equality and discrimination at work remain pressing concerns for employees, managers and, more broadly, for society. Achieving equality is elusive and, indeed, the very meaning of equality is highly contested.
This subject explores the legal meanings of equality, with a focus on the frameworks through which Australian parliaments have sought to address inequality, discrimination and harassment. It examines federal and state laws that deal with discrimination, including the four federal laws, the Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) and the adverse action provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Consideration is given to discrimination based on race, sex, disability, and pregnancy and family responsibilities. The lecturers in this subject combine many years of academic scholarship in this area, engagement in law reform debates and practical client-focused legal advice
This subject provides an examination of the development and current scope of Australian equality and discrimination law, as relevant in employment and work relationships. It will focus on federal and Victorian jurisdictions.
Principal topics include:
- A study of the framework and key features of federal and state legislative provisions dealing with equality and discrimination in the employment context, including theEqual Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic), the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth), the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) and theAge Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth)
- An examination of the general protection provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), including redress for certain types of adverse action
- Debates regarding the meaning of equality, discrimination and other contested concepts such as choice, especially as choice relates to carer responsibilities
- The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), and its potential impact in the interpretation of the Victorian Equal Opportunity Act
- Conciliation, dispute resolution and remedies
- Alternative regulatory regimes, including the National Employment Standards, equal remuneration provisions under the Fair Work Act, contract law and occupational health and safety issues such as bullying
- Current processes of legislative revision at federal and state level
- The potential for future developments in the field.
- 12.5 pts
The application of international human rights law (IHRL) in situations of armed conflict is one of the most contested areas of contemporary international law. The controversy begins with the identification of the applicable branch (or branches) of law. Are states only bound by international humanitarian law (IHL) or are they also bound by their human rights obligations? This points to other areas of dispute: to what extent do states owe human rights obligations outside their borders? Can states derogate from IHRL in armed conflict? Debates also surround issues such as whether non-state armed actors are bound by human rights law and whether states owe human rights obligations to the members of their armed forces while on military operations. We will explore these issues and more, examining the gaps that exist between IHRL jurisprudence and the practice of militarily active states, including Australia.
Principal topics include:
- What are human rights? How have human rights claims arisen in armed conflict situations?
- What is an international/non-international armed conflict? What is a military occupation? Where does IHL apply when an armed conflict exists? Why might a state wish a situation to be (or not to be) characterised as an armed conflict?
- In what circumstances does an armed conflict enable a state to derogate from its human rights obligations? Which obligations can be derogated from?
- What is the current jurisprudence on the applicability of human rights in armed conflict (with particular emphasis on relevant case law of the European and Inter-American Courts of Human Rights)? Has the changing nature of armed conflict resulted in changes in emphasis? To what extent has this case law been accepted by states?
- How and when do human rights apply extra-territorially (that is, when is a state bound by human rights law outside its national borders)? How might this apply to Australia’s international military deployments?
- How might human rights law assist in addressing issues such as gendered violence, weapons such as drones, or targeted killings?
- Do non-state armed actors owe human rights obligations? Do international organisations engaging in violence have human rights obligations?
- Does a state have human rights obligations towards its own military personnel when deployed on operations?
- To what extent have human rights featured in justifications for the resort to violence within and across state borders? What is the relevance of notions such as ‘the responsibility to protect,’ ‘human security,’ or ‘protection of civilians’?
- 12.5 pts
International commercial arbitration is the most important method globally for resolving cross-border commercial disputes. The focus of this subject is on the basic principles of international commercial arbitration law and is taught from the perspective of both the practitioner advising clients and the scholar interested in advanced research. There will be a particular focus on the desirability of arbitration compared with other dispute resolution methods, the relationships between the courts and arbitrators, drafting techniques and developments in Australia and other countries.
Principal topics include:
- The nature of international arbitration
- Applicable law in international arbitration
- The Australian procedural regime and an introduction to the UNCITRAL Model Law
- Enforcing international arbitration agreements
- Appointment and qualifications of arbitrators
- Misconduct of arbitrators
- Privacy and confidentiality
- Enforcement and challenge of awards.
- 12.5 pts
This subject introduces the techniques and institutions used to manage and resolve international disputes, focusing on both diplomatic (negotiation, mediation, inquiry, and conciliation) and legal (arbitration and judicial settlement) methods. Students will explore historical and topical examples to analyse when, how, and with what effect states, corporations, and individuals have resorted to different forms of international adjudication or arbitration to settle disputes, and consider the extent to which powerful states such as China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US have embraced international dispute settlement. The subject provides detailed analysis of the jurisdictional, procedural, and compliance issues that have arisen in classic and current cases across various substantive areas of international law, including investment, trade, environment, human rights, nuclear testing, the law of the sea, the use of force, and territorial sovereignty. Students will become familiar with different dispute settlement bodies and mechanisms, including the International Court of Justice, investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms, the dispute settlement systems established by the World Trade Organization and the UN Law of the Sea Convention, regional human rights courts and tribunals, and dispute settlement under the Chinese Belt and Road initiative. We will conclude by examining and identifying emergent trends in and challenges to international dispute settlement.
Principal topics include:
- The broad historical and political context of international dispute settlement
- The international obligation to settle disputes by peaceful means
- The role of diplomatic procedures, such as negotiation, mediation, and conciliation
- The International Court of Justice, including issues involving state consent to jurisdiction, reservations to the optional clause, the evaluation of scientific evidence, and the Court's advisory jurisdiction
- Investor-state dispute settlement, including issues relating to jurisdiction, the use of precedent, and the recognition and enforcement of awards
- WTO dispute resolution procedures and the challenges facing the Appellate Body
- Dispute settlement under the UN Law of the Sea Convention
- Regional human rights courts and tribunals
- Dispute settlement under the Chinese Belt and Road initiative
- Backlash against and reform of international dispute settlement mechanisms
- 12.5 pts
International investment law regulates the entry and operation of foreign investment and is one of the fastest-growing fields of public international law. This subject begins by tracing the historical, political and economic causes for the protection of foreign investment across custom, bilateral and regional investment treaties. It then focuses on the unique system of dispute resolution in this field, which gives private (foreign) actors the right to pursue claims for damages against states. This subject explores a series of case studies to evaluate the impact of investment law across a range of core values, including public health, environmental regulation and the protection of human rights.
Principal topics include:
- Nature, evolution and context of international investment law
- Overview of bilateral investment treaties (BITs), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the Energy Charter Treaty and parts of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
- Scope of protection: definition of ‘investor’ and ‘investment‘
- Relative obligations of non-discrimination: most-favored-nation (MFN) and national treatment
- Obligation to accord foreign investors ‘fair and equitable treatment‘
- Expropriation and the quantification of compensation
- Contract claims versus treaty claims: the ‘umbrella’ clause
- Arbitration under the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention.
- 12.5 pts
This subject will provide an interdisciplinary framework to discuss various aspects of the intersection between law, human behaviour and justice. The first part will be dedicated to developing a basic familiarity with the relevant principles of psychology and law and discuss the ways in which they interrelate. In the second part of the subject we will discuss different real life examples, involving judicial decision making, witness reliability, negotiations and more, in which the study of psychological concepts in the legal world plays out.
- 12.5 pts
As we rapidly approach the 30th anniversary of the landmark Australian medical law decision Rogers v Whitaker in 2022, medical litigation remains a vibrant and challenging field, given the rapid pace of scientific and social developments that generate new challenges for the law. Many are at the core of personal importance - birth, reproduction and personal autonomy. The legal issues are wide-ranging, covering the existence of duties, what should be considered negligent, the challenges of legal causation and appropriate compensation- all against a background of insurance affordability, medical treatment innovations and dispute resolution process changes.
This subject examines the framework of medical litigation, current challenges and issues on the horizon. The subject coordinator Bill Madden is a lawyer specialising in medical litigation, a co-author of two health law texts and a regular writer and presenter on medical law topics.
Principal topics include:
- History and incidence of medical litigation
- The impact of recent legal and court-based reforms
- Duty, breach of duty and statutory defences / protections
- Consent, informed consent and treatment errors
- Factual and normative causation and loss of chance
- The changing framework of expert evidence
- Privacy and confidentiality issues
- Mandatory reporting impacts
- Coroners’ investigations and hearings.
- 12.5 pts
This highly interactive subject will give students practice-relevant skills for negotiation and dispute resolution. Negotiating effectively involves being able to change the conversation, shifting from adversarial to collaborative approaches. The best negotiators are also skilled at structuring processes and listening beneath what is said. This program will introduce a proven framework for creating value and resolving disputes, informed by recent research and extensive practice. Using experiential approaches, case studies and simulations, participants will deepen their abilities to represent clients and negotiate across a range of practice contexts. Participants will have multiple opportunities to refine their negotiation and dispute management skills, and will leave with a series of practical tools for dealing with difficult negotiation behaviours and hard bargaining tactics in diverse settings. This subject will be useful for those working on a wide range of complex issues in a range of contexts including commercial, environmental, public policy and human rights.
Drawing on current interdisciplinary literature and case examples from practice, students will:
- Learn a proven framework for dispute analysis and negotiation to address a range of disputes
- Understand the dynamics of intractable disputes and a range of tools to address them
- Heighten their awareness of personal strengths and weaknesses as a negotiator
- Gain problem-solving techniques to enhance possible solutions in complex negotiations
- Acquire skills for choosing the right process to craft durable outcomes
- Heighten their abilities to work across diverse contexts
- Practice and refine negotiation and dispute management skills toward more successful outcomes
Successful completion of the subject will expand participants’ abilities for complex issue analysis, intervention and follow-up as negotiators, representatives and facilitators in negotiation and dispute resolution processes. Students will learn valuable skills of integrative thinking and creativity through experiential exercises and their final papers.
- 12.5 pts
Irrespective of their speciality, lawyers must negotiate. Litigators resolve far more disputes through negotiation than by trial. Business lawyers in every domain negotiate on behalf of their clients. Commercial litigators, public interest lawyers, in-house counsel, government lawyers, criminal lawyers, and tort lawyers all share the need to be effective negotiators. However few lawyers have any systematic understanding of why negotiations often fail or have suboptimal results, of the dilemmas inherent in negotiations, or of the characteristics of effective negotiators The same can be said for most non-lawyers who negotiate in business or other contexts.
By combining theory and practice, this subject should enhance students’ understanding of negotiation and their effectiveness as negotiators. The subject should improve their ability to prepare for a negotiation, to engage others in joint problem-solving, and to select appropriate strategies when negotiations don’t go well. Above all, this subject will equip students to continue refining their skills as they gain more experience.
Florrie Darwin has taught negotiation skills to students, as well as a broad range of professionals, around the world.
Principal topics include:
- Introduction to negotiation principles
- Basic framework for preparing, conducting and reviewing a negotiation
- Giving and receiving feedback
- Creating value in negotiations
- The challenge of distribution
- Effective listening
- Managing interpersonal differences
- Negotiating via email
- Effective responses to difficult negotiation tactics
- Dealing with structural complexity in negotiation/multi-party negotiations.
- 12.5 pts
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is at the centre of ongoing debates concerning sovereignty and development. Its dispute settlement system, while currently under threat, has been active in resolving a wide range of international disputes, with jurisdiction over some of the largest and most significant matters arising today. This subject offers a sophisticated understanding of the WTO and its dispute settlement system, including a detailed analysis of the fundamental principles and jurisprudence of WTO law. The instructor is a leading scholar in WTO law and a former Legal Officer with the Appellate Body Secretariat of the WTO.
Principal topics include:
- History and objectives of the WTO
- WTO dispute settlement
- Core disciplines under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994):
- Tariff bindings
- Non-discrimination (most-favoured nation (MFN) and national treatment)
- Prohibition on quantitative restrictions
- Exceptions to WTO commitments, eg environment, health, public morals, culture, free trade agreements, and special and differential treatment for developing countries
- The regulation of trade in services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)
- Current challenges facing the WTO
Overview subject
This introductory subject is compulsory for graduate diploma students with no previous training in law. It is highly recommended for international students who do not have a degree from a common law jurisdiction. Students are advised to attend Australian Legal Process and Legal Institutions prior to undertaking any other subject.
- Australian Legal Process and Legal Institutions pts