Detecting Flaws in Reasoning

This micro-credential is ideal for anyone seeking practical skills to improve their reasoning and enhance their decision-making skills. Professionals working toward a career in intelligence will find this course particularly valuable, as well as those employed in risk assessment roles in industries such as security (including national, corporate, & cybersecurity), insurance, government, immigration, the police, banking and investments.

There are no eligibility requirements.

This micro-credential has been co-developed by a National Intelligence Community agency which also co-developed the Reasoning Stress Test.

Throughout the course, you'll gain a strong grounding in the Reasoning Stress Test, which will help you identify and correct the most important and common reasoning errors that can undermine analytical assessments. You'll gain concrete guidance on how to master this crucial part of argument evaluation and gain essential skills to apply this knowledge to your career, whether you work as an analyst or in a related field.

Learning in this course is aligned with the Analytics Standards set out in the USA’s Intelligence Community Directive 203 – a framework for developing education and training in analytic skills.

By the end of this course, you'll have a greater understanding of how to efficiently detect common reasoning errors, using the Reasoning Stress Test. You'll be able to:

• Detect reasoning flaws in complex arguments, judgements, and intelligence analysis
• Analyse and evaluate reasoning in arguments in text and presentations.

This course runs over four weeks, including two weeks of guided and self-directed learning, and two weeks to complete assessment tasks.

Your total time commitment is approximately 42 hours, which includes:

• 12 hours of interactive, self-paced online study and practice activities with feedback
• 10 hours self-directed learning
• 20 hours assessment tasks.

Assessment:

• Analysis task: Review three fictionalised national security intelligence assessments and identify any flaws present (80%)
• Reasoning test: Short multiple-choice tests to identify flaws in short analytic judgements and analysis (20%).

Once you've successfully completed this course, you will be awarded your Detecting Flaws in Reasoning micro-credential. This digital certificate will warrant the achievement of knowledge, skills and capabilities outlined in the learning outcomes. It may also include artefacts (such as videos and written material) related to both experiential and work-integrated learning, including translatable assessment that is practical to your professional life. You can also share your micro-credential digitally and via social media by adding it to your personal platforms, such as LinkedIn. See example certificate.

Argument evaluation is best mastered with hands-on practice and expert feedback. Throughout this course, you'll practise the skill via short, constructed examples, and work up to real and complex intelligence assessments.

Videos and discussions further emphasise and explore the application of the skills. You'll also undertake flexible, self-directed learning, and receive valuable guidance and feedback from your course facilitators.

There is no set expiry date.